Rana II PVC Bootfoot Hip Wader, Cleated or Felt Outsole

Rana II PVC Bootfoot Hip Wader, Cleated or Felt Outsole

Kylebooker Rana II PVC Bootfoot Hip Wader: Cleated or Felt Outsole – Is It Worth the Price?

For avid anglers, a reliable pair of waders is an essential investment. Whether you’re wading through rocky streams or muddy banks, having durable, comfortable, and functional waders can make or break your fishing experience. The Kylebooker Rana II PVC Bootfoot Hip Wader is a popular choice among budget-conscious anglers, but how does it perform in terms of durability, comfort, and overall value? In this review, we’ll analyze its features, pros and cons, and whether it offers good value for money—especially when choosing between the cleated and felt outsole options.

Key Features of the Kylebooker Rana II PVC Wader

1. PVC Construction for Durability
The Rana II is made from PVC (polyvinyl chloride), a material known for its waterproof properties and resistance to punctures. Unlike neoprene waders, PVC waders are generally more affordable and easier to maintain. However, they may lack the flexibility and breathability of higher-end materials.

2. Bootfoot Design for Convenience
The bootfoot design means the boots are permanently attached, eliminating the hassle of separate wading shoes. This setup is great for quick entry and exit, but it also means you can’t replace the boots if they wear out before the waders themselves.

3. Outsole Options: Cleated vs. Felt
– Cleated Outsole: Ideal for rocky or slippery terrain, providing extra grip. However, cleats can wear down over time and may not be suitable for boat use (as they can damage surfaces).
– Felt Outsole: Better for smooth, algae-covered rocks and provides excellent traction in most freshwater conditions. However, felt can retain moisture and may be less durable on rough terrain.

4. Adjustable Suspenders & Comfort Fit
The waders come with adjustable suspenders, allowing for a customized fit. The PVC material, while not as stretchy as neoprene, is designed to provide a snug yet comfortable fit for extended wear.

Pros & Cons

Pros:
✅ Affordable – A budget-friendly option compared to premium waders.
✅ Waterproof & Durable – PVC resists leaks and abrasions well.
✅ Good Traction – Both cleated and felt outsoles perform well in their respective environments.
✅ Easy to Clean – PVC is low-maintenance and dries quickly.

Cons:
❌ Less Breathable – PVC can cause sweating in warm weather.
❌ Limited Flexibility – Not as stretchy as neoprene, which may restrict movement.
❌ Bootfoot Limitations – If the boots wear out, the entire wader may need replacement.

Performance & Value for Money
For casual anglers or beginners, the Kylebooker Rana II offers solid performance at an attractive price point. While it may not match the comfort of high-end breathable waders, its durability and waterproofing make it a practical choice for occasional use.

– Best for: Small streams, ponds, and light wading.
– Not ideal for: Extreme cold (lack of insulation) or heavy-duty fishing in rough terrain.

Cleated vs. Felt: Which Should You Choose?
– Go for Cleated if you fish in rocky, uneven riverbeds where extra grip is needed.
– Choose Felt if you frequently encounter slippery, algae-covered rocks in slow-moving waters.

Final Verdict: Good Budget Option
The Kylebooker Rana II PVC Bootfoot Hip Wader is a cost-effective choice for anglers who need reliable waterproof protection without breaking the bank. While it lacks some premium features like breathability and replaceable boots, its durability and traction options make it a worthwhile investment for occasional or beginner fishermen.

If you’re looking for an affordable, no-frills wader that gets the job done, the Rana II is a solid pick—just be mindful of your preferred outsole based on your fishing environment.

Rating: 7.5/10 (Great for the price, but not for extreme conditions).

Would you choose the cleated or felt version? Share your thoughts in the comments! 🎣